I don’t understand how Major League Baseball can alternately proclaim that the game is healthier than ever while making moves to disenfranchise the average fan. One trend that makes almost no sense to me is the shrinking number of seats in new stadiums. The Mets new ballpark CitiField (which, I will admit, looks incredible in the plans) will have 9,000 fewer seats than Shea Stadium. At the same time, the Mets are promoting their young, charismatic team to the point where many now question the Yankees’ dominance in New York.
Or take a team on the west coast – the Oakland Athletics (or whatever they’ll be known as once they move out to the ‘burbs). Their proposed new stadium will fit 32,000 fans. From the AP:
With only 32,000 seats, the stadium would be baseball’s most intimate venue, [A's co-owner Lew] Wolff said.
Of course, we know that “intimate” means - higher ticket prices and fewer “average fans.” While the move to smaller stadiums might make financial sense – economics dictates that by shrinking the supply, the asking price rises – is it really a wise PR move for a sport that desperately needs to attract younger fans? Baseball faces stiff competition for America’s entertainment dollar from the NFL, NBA, and the booming video game industry. It doesn’t make sense to charge $40 for upper deck seats and effectively shutting out families in exchange for corporate suits. Sure, it brings in money right now but in 20 years who will come to the games?
[Forgive the Yahoo link that will expire in 2 weeks or so - I looked for something on the Oakland A's stadium on their website but it had no information - perhaps they don't want to anger their current fanbase with news about a stadium outside of Oakland?]
Posted by Brian
Posted by Brian
Posted by Brian